
Assessment Task 2: Research Project (30%)
| Assessment Task 2 | Due Date | % | SILOs Assessed |
| Research Project | 2 October 2022 | 30% | SILOs 1-5 |
| Description of Task | |||
| This is a team work on a research project, weighting 30% of the total assessment in this subject. Each team consists of no more than three members. The project has two components: Part 1 is a 3000-word written submission (20%) due on 2 October and Part 2 is a live virtual presentation due on Thursday 6 October (class time). |
Project topic: Issues in accounting for cryptocurrencies
There are many issues that accountants may encounter in practice for which no accounting standard currently exists; one example is cryptocurrencies. For example, as no accounting standard currently exists to explain how cryptocurrency should be accounted for, accountants have no alternative but to refer to existing accounting standards
Sourced from ACCA, Accounting for cryptocurrencies, https://www.accaglobal.com/in/en/student/exam-support-resources/professional-exams-study-resources/strategic-business-reporting/technical-articles/cryptocurrencies.html, accessed 13 July 2021.
References:
IBIS World: Cryptocurrency Exchange industry in Australia, available at https://my-ibisworld-com.ez.library.latrobe.edu.au/au/en/industry-specialized/od5539/about (Latrobe student email required to login for free access).
Nadeem MA, Liu Z, Pitafi AH, Younis A, Xu Y. Investigating the Adoption Factors of Cryptocurrencies—A Case of Bitcoin: Empirical Evidence from China. SAGE Open. January 2021. doi:10.1177/2158244021998704
The footnote analyst: Bitcoin: The financial reporting challenge for investors, https://www.footnotesanalyst.com/bitcoin-the-financial-reporting-challenge-for-investors/, accessed 13 July 2021
Hileman, G. & Rauchs, M. (2017). Global cryptocurrency benchmarking study, https://www.crowdfundinsider.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Global-Cryptocurrency-Benchmarking-Study.pdf
Money Smart, Cryptocurrencies and ICOs: What to watch out for with cryptocurrencies and ICOs, https://moneysmart.gov.au/investment-warnings/cryptocurrencies-and-icos, accessed 13 July 2021
PwC (2019) Cryptographic assets and related transactions: accounting
considerations under IFRS, https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/audit-services/ifrs/publications/ifrs-16/cryptographic-assets-related-transactions-accounting-considerations-ifrs-pwc-in-depth.pdf
Vetter, A., (2018). CPAs’ top 5 questions about blockchain, cryptocurrencies, https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/newsletters/2018/jul/5-questions-blockchain-cryptocurrencies.html
Section 1 Assessment objectives
This assessment task has two related objectives. The first objective is to evaluate student’s skills development in accounting technical competency areas (TCA), and the other objective is to evaluate students’ skills development in professional competency areas (PCA). Both are in line with the expectations of the 2021 accounting professional accreditation guidelines.
Objective 1 TCA
O1.1 Financial accounting and reporting
a). Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used to prepare financial statement and apply significant professional judgement in the context of climate-related financial disclosures
b). Discuss the theoretical principles underlying accounting practice
c). Interpret reports including non-financial data and information such as sustainability, reports, integrated reports and extended external reporting
O1.2. Information and Communications Technology
- Use relevant software to record virtual professional presentations
Objective 2 PCA
O2.1 Intellectual Skills
- Evaluate data and information
- Apply practical thinking to solve problems, make decisions and exercise good judgment in complex organisational situations.
O2.2 Interpersonal and Communication Skills
- Demonstrate collaboration, cooperation, and teamwork when working towards organisational goals.
- Communicate clearly and concisely when presenting, discussing, and reporting knowledge and ideas in formal and informal situations.
- Demonstrate awareness of cultural and language differences in all communication
- Apply active listening and effective interviewing techniques.
- Apply negotiation skills to reach solutions and agreements.
O2.3 Personal Skills
a) Set high personal standards of performance and monitor through reflective activity and feedback from others
b) Manage time and resources to achieve academic, personal and/or professional commitments.
c) Anticipate challenges and plan potential solutions
d) Apply an open mind to new opportunities.
e) Identify the potential impact of personal and organizational bias.
f) Identify the implications of professional values, ethics and attitudes in decision making
O2.4 Ethical Principles, Professional Values and Integrity
- Explain the role and importance of ethics in relation to business and good governance.
Section 2 Project requirements
You and your team are required to
- Briefly explain the concept of cryptocurrencies by review the Cryptocurrency Exchange industry in Australia (IBIS World).
- Critically review literature (see p. 2) on the issues in accounting for cryptocurrencies, for example, recognition, classification, and measurement.
- Apply either Positive Accounting Theory or Institutional Theory to explain factors that may influence the adoption (or rejection) of cryptocurrencies.
- Identify three listed companies at your group’s choice. The three companies can be based in Australia and/or overseas (for example, your home country if you are international student). All selected companies must have accepted cryptocurrencies in business transactions.
Analyse how cryptocurrencies are recognised, measured, and reported by the sample companies
- Discuss the implications of cryptocurrencies for accounting professionals and practices.
- Critically reflect on the project experience in terms of successes and lessons learnt in terms of the assessment objectives (see Section 1 above).
Section 3: Submission requirements
Part 1 Written report (20%, due on 2 October)
- The written report (team work) of approximately 3000 words (excluding references, abstract, tables, and team reflection) needs to include the following headings
- Project Title
- Background including the objective of the project
- Literature review
- Theoretical framework
- Project data collection and analysis
- Discussion
- Individual reflection on the team project (no more than 100 words for each member)
- The group written report must be submitted through the Turnitin online submission on LMS.
Note: If you experience difficulty in submitting your group assignment online, please contact La Trobe Edu Tech service at https://latrobe.service-now.com/edt?id=edt_index for assistance, or by phone 03-94791555
The Turnitin Similarity Report should be no more than 15%.
- Referencing and style
- Assignment must be typed using Word document, with double alignment, and 1.5-lines space.
- Assignment is required to use either an APA or Harvard referencing style (see La Trobe library http://latrobe.libguides.com/referencing/ for further details).
- Assignment without proper referencing will be subject to substantial deduction of marks. This may result in the assignment being marked zero.
- Observing relevant university policies outlined below.
- Late submission
The University requires fair, consistent and transparent treatment of late submission of assessment tasks. The procedure for late submission is documented in the Late Submission of Assessment Tasks document (Ref. no. 112027D). It states:
The standard penalty for late submission of assessment tasks is 5% of the marks for that task for each delay in submission of a day or partial day up to a maximum of five (5) working days after the due date. Assessment tasks will not be accepted after the earlier of the following occurrences:
The fifth (5th) working day after the due date; or
Feedback on the assessment task has been returned to any student by the Teaching Team member.
- Special consideration
Submission of special consideration applications for assignments, mid-semester tests and final examinations should be made online at: https://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/admin/forms/special-consideration/submit-or-review-application
Students are responsible to protect their work and save data by making necessary backup. Loss of data due to a computer or storage devices problems will not be considered a legitimate reason for an extension.
- Academic integrity
Academic integrity means being honest in academic work and taking responsibility for learning the conventions of scholarship. La Trobe University views this seriously as evidenced by the following extract:
Academic honesty is a fundamental principle in teaching, learning, research and scholarship. The University requires its academic staff and students to observe the highest ethical standards in all aspects of academic work and it demonstrates its commitment to these values by awarding due credit for honestly conducted scholarly work, and by penalising academic misconduct and all forms of cheating.
Academic Integrity Procedures (2012, p. 1 of 6)
Academic misconduct includes improper referencing, plagiarism, copying and cheating. You should familiarise yourself with your responsibilities in relation to Academic Integrity and if you have any questions, direct them to your Course Advisor. Information can be found on the website at: www.latrobe.edu.au/students/academic-integrity
For assistance with referencing visit http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/academic- integrity/referencing-help
Plagiarism is defined as ‘The practice that involves use of another person’s intellectual output and presenting it (without appropriate acknowledgement) as one’s own’.
Examples of plagiarism:
- Word-for-word copying of sentences/paragraphs in an assignment without acknowledgement or with insufficient or improper acknowledgement;
- Downloading essays or assignments from the web and presenting these for assessment;
- Presenting another student’s work or research data as the student’s work;
- Copying out parts of any text without acknowledging the source(s). This may be written text, structures within texts, diagrams, formulae, sound files, still photographs, audio-visual material (sound and image files), graphics/animations/multimedia objects, other computer based material, mathematical proofs, art objects, products and others. This can be done as verbatim copying or paraphrasing.
- The use of someone else’s concepts, experimental results, experimental conclusions or conclusions drawn from analysing evidence or arguments without acknowledging the originator of the idea(s) or conclusion(s).
To prevent plagiarism, students are responsible for:
- Understanding and respecting the University’s policies and procedures regarding plagiarism, collusion, and other forms of academic misconduct, and as such should only submit work for correction or academic credit that is their own or that properly acknowledges the ideas, interpretations, words or creative works of others;
- Avoiding the lending or making accessible original work to others;
- Being clear about the appropriate referencing rules that are applicable to their field of study;
- Refusing to be a party to another student’s efforts to undermine the academic integrity of the University.
- Seeking assistance with their learning and assessment tasks if they are unsure of appropriate forms of acknowledgement.
Part 2 Virtual Oral Presentation (Week 11 Live Zoom class on Thursday)
- The team presentation should be no more than 15 minutes. See attached presentation rubric to prepare your presentation.
- Each member of the group needs to participate in the team presentation, and marks are allocated for both individual performance and group performance.
Section 4 Marking criteria
Part 1 Written Report (20%)
| Requirement | Assessment Criteria | Possible Marks | Marks received |
| R1 | Demonstrate the ability to summarise cryptocurrencies | 10 | |
| R2 | Demonstrates the ability to conduct literature review; understand and synthesise complex ideas in accounting for cryptocurrencies | 20 | |
| R3 | Demonstrates the ability to apply accounting theories to interpret the adoption (or rejection) of cryptocurrencies | 20 | |
| R4 | Demonstrates the ability of data collection and analysis | 20 | |
| R5 | Demonstrates the ability to develop persuasive argument | 10 | |
| R6 | Team reflection on the learning experience in the research project | 10 | |
| Style and presentation | The presentation of the results should be clear, concise and accompanied by expository text accessible to the reader.The presentation of the entire assignment should be written in English of an appropriate academic register and of a format and standard of presentation acceptable to business study | 10 | |
| Total possible marks out of 100 | 100 |
| Task response(maximum marks) | Good response (8-10) | Satisfactory response (5-7) | Unsatisfactory response (0-4) | |||
| Structure and content (2) | Appropriate structure and organisation | Generally appropriate structure and organisation some parts difficult to follow | Structure and organisation not appropriate –difficult to follow | |||
| Introduction(1) | Outlines context, topic and content | Outlines context, topic and content but not all clear | Does not outline context, topic and content | |||
| Body(1) | Main ideas logical & clear | Main ideas generally clear Some lack of clarity | Does not clearly address main ideas | |||
| Conclusion(1) | Sums up topic well | Generally sums up topic well | Does not sum up – no clear conclusion | |||
| Evidence(1) | Appropriately paraphrases & references | Generally appropriately paraphrases & references | Relies on information copied from texts; not appropriately referenced | |||
| Use of notes / slides(1) | Notes used well | Notes / slides used more than necessary | Overuse of notesRead rather than talked | |||
| Volume and clarity of expression(1) | Clear, easy to hear and understand; appropriate expression for oral presentation | Mainly clear ; appropriate expression – errors do not detract from meaning | Difficult to understand; inappropriate words and expression for oral presentation | |||
| Timing(1) | Timing enhances meaning, suitable pauses | Mostly well timed; could pause | Too fast/slow; timing detracts from meaning | |||
| Eye contact with camera & body language(1) | Eye contact consistent | Eye contact but not necessarily inclusive | Little eye contact with camera |
Part 2 Virtual Oral Presentation (10%)

担心学业?你还有其他选择!
KJEssay 学年守护计划!
我们是全网首家积极根据新政策优化应对方案的论文服务机构!
全面升级给你最好的防护!
1、远程代劳,资料下载,作业提交,有需要全程代劳!
KJEssay已对目前主流的教学系统Blackboard、ReCap,以及各校的ePortfolio,对全体老师做过专项培训,这方面有困难的学生,可直接授意老师代劳,我们将为你全面服务!
2、考核考试,老师提前充分备考,同程协助,助力满分!
KJEssay 保障学业提供全面服务!专业老师团队先学习了解课程内容,做充足应对,设计方案,
考试时,老师,专业应急团队,客服,同时待命!
老师快速反应,迅速做出最佳答案以及思路!
应急团队集思广益可对重难点迅速突破!
客服居中,全面负责协调沟通,提高效率!
给予及时而效率的全面帮助!
3、远程上课,录屏打卡课程讨论一个不落!
针对目前在线网课,KJEssay做出专项研究,对包括Autodesk、Azure、Skype、Zoom等视频教学软件有着充分熟悉。上网打卡一个不落。
4、保障隐私安全,全程一人全面追踪服务!所有人均签有隐私合同!
全面服务将主要安排在一位老师全面负责,做好对信息情况的充足了解掌握,不假他手!更因为全程彻底的参与,对情况以及考试有更彻底的把握!更能依据情况做出应对!也更易获取更高分!
客服以及第三方,时刻追踪,定期反馈情况。
5、一举一动全面反馈!时刻监控,看得到的全过程!24小时客服待命!
我们一直把沟通反馈,放在重中之重!尤其是代理服务,最了解的肯定还是客户,所以KJEssay会反馈所有的情况,没有客户允许下,不擅专!不乱动!
以最安全的形式,保障拿到最好的成绩!
在上半年的全面代理中,现已取得了优异的成绩与效果。

















新学期,我们应对留学网课,更有经验,更加从容!
关于KJEssay
我们是KJEssay,31639人的选择!




现在就可联系我们

微信->添加朋友->添加企业微信联系人:13262280223
官网:https://www.kjessay.com
邮箱:kaijiewrite@163.com service@kjessay.com
WhatsApp:+44 7410496844(推荐添加)
QQ:1483266981
立即联系我们参与活动吧~

