联系我们： 手动添加方式: 微信>添加朋友>企业微信联系人>13262280223 或者 QQ: 1483266981

PSYC 1011: Essay Marking Criteria Criteria Outstanding (HD) Very Good (D) Good (CR) Fair (P) Inadequate (F) Understands Key Concepts (20%) Identify the main concepts/issues associated with working memory training . Comprehensive and sophisticated explanation of the concepts/issues based on the literature. Demonstrates a deep understanding of the key concepts/issues together with original thinking Comprehensive explanation of the key concepts/issues, based on the literature, Demonstrates a deep understanding of the key concepts/issues Good summary of the literature Demonstrates awareness of the key concepts/issues but lacks depth and/or clarity at some points. Basic summary based on the literature. Demonstrates a limited awareness of the key concepts/issues Incomplete summary of the literature. Lacks evidence of awareness of the key concepts/issues Strength of Argument (25%) Comprehensive and sophisticated argument based on the literature. Demonstrates original thought and integration of the literature into a clear, logical and cohesive structure. Comprehensive argument based on the literature . Demonstrates clear understanding of the key points presented with a logical and cohesive structure. Argument present and based on the literature. May be overly descriptive in parts and/or not entirely logical and cohesive. Basic summary, mainly descriptive. Some evidence of argument, but limited and lacks cohesive structure or support from the literature No Argument presented. Incomplete summary of the findings that lacks argument structure Depth of Analysis in response to the task (30%) Engagement with and critical consideration of the key concepts underlying the topic. This should be based on a variety of theoretical and empirical sources. Highly perceptive examination that integrates a range of theoretical/empirical perspectives. A clear examination of the issues and evidence. Demonstrates originality or insight into the background and potential explanations in relation to the question. Excellent and original integration and interpretation of the evidence Sophisticated examination that integrates theoretical/empirical perspectives. Demonstrates a sound understanding of the key concepts and integrates evidence in relation to the question. Clear interpretation of the evidence Attempt to examine the theoretical/empirical perspectives. Clear summary of key concepts with some integration of the evidence in relation to the question. Interprets the evidence, but not consistently and/or not always clear. Some consideration of the literature in relation to the question, but limited. Basic summary of the key concepts with limited integration of evidence. Some attempt to interpret evidence but limited and/or unclear. Incomplete summary of the literature. Failure to engage with the evidence in relation to the question. No interpretation of the evidence PSYC 1011: Essay Marking Criteria Criteria Outstanding (HD) Very Good (D) Good (CR) Fair (P) Inadequate (F) Structure and organization of response (15%) Appropriateness of overall structure of the response to the task Clarity and coherence of response to the task. Addressed all parts of the essay question. Clarity and appropriateness of sentence structure, vocabulary use, spelling, punctuation and word length Comprehensively completed all aspects. Excellent structure and organization and clear response for all parts of the assessment. Excellent use of language and academic conventions. Logical, clear, cohesive paragraph structure. Complete assessment Appropriate structure and organization and clear response for all parts of the assessment. Accurate and appropriate use of language and academic conventions. Clear, cohesive paragraph structure. Complete assessment. Appropriate structure and organization, Response is mostly clear. Appropriate use of language conventions, may have some small errors. May be some issues with paragraph structure, but mostly clear and cohesive. Complete assessment. Some evidence of appropriate structure or organization, but response is unclear in several sections. Inaccurate/Inappropriate use of language conventions but assessment still readable. Limited paragraph structure and/or paragraphs are not clear/cohesive. Incomplete assessment or no attempt to organize response. Inaccurate use of language conventions throughout making the assessment difficult to read. No paragraph structure Appropriate APA Formatting and academic integrity (10%) Clarity, consistency and appropriateness of conventions for quoting, paraphrasing, attributing sources of information and APA 7th edition referencing (in text and reference list) Excellent use of APA 7th edition formatting for in text citations and final References list. Accurate citations when paraphrasing or quoting. Excellent paraphrasing. Limited/no use of direct quoting – any quotes are highly appropriate and effective. Good use of APA 7th edition formatting for in text citations and final References list. Accurate citations when paraphrasing or quoting. Good paraphrasing with limited use of direct quoting. Appropriate use of APA 7th edition formatting for in text citations and final Reference list. Citations present when paraphrasing or quoting, and mostly accurate. Attempts to paraphrase but may have small inconsistencies and/or some over-use of direct quotes. Inconsistent use of APA 7th edition formatting for in text citations and final References l iist. Some citations missing when paraphrasing or quoting. Some inappropriate paraphrasing and/or too many direct quotes Little to no use of APA 7th edition formatting for in text and final References list. Lacks citations when paraphrasing or quoting. No attempt to paraphrase. Mostly direct quotes.