联系我们： 手动添加方式: 微信>添加朋友>企业微信联系人>13262280223 或者 QQ: 1483266981

Course paper requirements
Environmental system modelling uses a wide range of approaches. One of the challenges in modelling is to be able to make a sensible choice of model, and to justify this with reference to the nature of the problem and the available data. It is also important to be able to communicate the pros and cons of the chosen model ling methods in a way that is easily understood by users, who will often not be expert modellers.
The assessment for this module involves production of a critical review of a specific modelling approach and some of the environmental or climate change science problems to which it can be usefully applied. We have prepared a list of suitable topics, but please contact the course convenor (Jon French, j.french@ucl.ac.uk) if you want to stray off this list. We will try to accommodate anyone with particular interests.

The provisional list of topics is:
Empirical transfer function models (useful Web of Science search options: [“Transfer function” environmental] or [“Transfer function” paleoecology] – but please experiment a little with these!)
Machine learning (useful Web of Science search options: [e.g. “Machine learning” hydrology], [“Machine learning” climate] etc. to narrow the field a little)
Box models (useful Web of Science search options: [err, well … try “Box model” ], and then refine the field to something like ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ECOLOGY or METEOROLOGY ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES. You will then get around 1,000 hits rather than 10,000!
Fluid dynamics models (useful Web of Science search options: [“environmental fluid dynamics model” or “hydrodynamic model” – maybe with “river” “coastal” “atmospheric” etc. to narrow the field a little)
Coupled models (useful Web of Science search options: [e.g. “Coupled ocean-atmosphere model”], “model coupling”)
Spatial models (useful Web of Science search options: [e.g. “spatially distributed hydrological” model]
Causal loop models

Reviews should have a title of the form

‘Empirical transfer function models in climate science: a critical review’

or

‘Empirical transfer function models in environmental science: a critical review’

Depending on whether you wish to focus on climate change or environmental science in general.

Content and structure
Your review should include:
A brief introduction to the history of the approach and more recent environmental/climate science applications. One or more diagrams might be useful here.
A summary of basic assumptions / foundations of the chosen approach, with an indication of application areas. You might narrow the focus to a selected field at this point given that, fluid dynamics models, for example, are very widely applied indeed. Equations are useful (and are not included in the word limit).
Illustrative case study applications and some of the active areas of research or model development. A good review will not just describe one case study after the other but will highlight details that illustrate particular aspects / variations of the approach. You are encouraged to produce one or more tables to summarise a selection of models / model types.
A critical discussion to sum up some of the pros and cons, including areas where the chosen model type offers the best approach, and some where it is less applicable. You might also identify areas where research is onoing or some challenges for the future in terms of improving our modelling capability.
References

Presentation guidelines
Reviews should be word-processed. Do not use font sizes less than 11. Include page numbers. Figures or tables may be used where appropriate. There is no page limit.
All references should be cited in the text and detailed in full in a list of references, formatted in a consistent style (you can choose any journal style you like).

Do NOT include an abstract.

Word limit
Reviews should be no more than 2500 words in length (excluding references and figure captions, tables etc). Penalties apply for exceedance of the word limit (refer to MSc Examination Rules).

Marking criteria
Coursework is assessed against the matrix of criteria provided on under the Assessment and Examinations tab of the Geography PGT Moodle page (refer to the matrix for Coursework).

Further guidance
An example of a published review article (Bach, P.M. et al. 2014. Review: A critical review of integrated urban water modelling: Urban drainage and beyond. Environmental Modelling and Software 54, 88-107) can be downloaded from the Geog0109 Moodle page.

Note that this is much longer than your word limit and you are not expected to produce anything quite as ambitious as this! It is intended to indicate the kind of academic writing style that is required and to show how tables and figures can be used to good effect to replace a lot of words.

Deadline
The completed practical report should be submitted using the Turnitin system via the Moodle page by the advertised deadline. Turnitin checks for plagiarism and the penalties for this are severe – please refer to MSc Examination Rules.