联系我们： 手动添加方式: 微信>添加朋友>企业微信联系人>13262280223 或者 QQ: 1483266981

Coventry University
BSc (Hons) in Global Logistics (Top-Up)
2023
Coursework
307AAE: Individual Project for Logistics and Transportation Preparation
Module: 307AAE – Individual Project for Logistics and Transportation Preparation
PM – Cohort: PSB307AAE Tri 223 CU_FTBSc GL 320 & Tri 223 CU_PTBSc GL 320
Assignment Number and Weighting: Coursework (100%)
Submission Date and Time: 15 Oct 23 23:59:00
The expected return of feedback and material work: 14 working days (2 weeks) from the deadline
Assessment is made up of multiple submissions: No
Details of multiple items in submission if relevant: Coursework – Submit Individually
Submission Procedure: Electronically via Blackboard (Turnitin) ONLY
Word Count: 2,000 words
Assignment Title: Based on Student Proposal
Aims and Summary
This module aims to provide preparation for a student to undertake a substantial
the project which will exercise in-depth technical, problem-solving, creative and other skills
required of a professional practitioner including working to appropriate ethical codes of
practice.
Successful completion of the module will require methodical planning, record keeping, and self-management, effective communication, and delivery of the report.
Support and guidance will be provided by a project supervisor who will be the primary point of contact for a student in this module.
Intended Module Learning Outcomes
The intended learning outcomes are that on completion of this module the student should be
able to:
1. Plan and take responsibility for a self-managed project within an appropriate ethical framework and apply for ethics approval.
2. Research and compile information relevant to the specialist subject area in which the project is based, maintaining a suitable log for recording information obtained and progress in the project.
3. Undertake analysis and design work appropriate to the anticipated outcomes of the project4. Communicate the work done through a written report of an appropriate academic standard
Indicative Content
1. In consultation with and to the satisfaction of the project supervisor, students must produce a project proposal stating the project aims and objectives, research questions, research methods, sources of information, a breakdown of activities, and time taken to achieve those objectives, and an ethical practice assessment.
2. The student must search for and compile relevant information from a variety of literature sources. All information gathered and used must be logged and subsequently referenced by the appropriate referencing style.
3. The student must select and use appropriate research methodologies relevant to the nature of the project.
Lectures will be scheduled during the module, at appropriate dates. The lectures will cover topics to support the design of a student project, production of a project proposal, research skills, ethical practice, plagiarism issues, etc.
Assessment:
The assessment is based on a 2,000-word dissertation. The final dissertation should demonstrate appropriate project management techniques and containing information relating to the topic area.
The student must participate in the ethics approval process for the research, consequently, the student must complete and submit an ethics proposal for approval before data collection. The student must ensure a timely fashion that will allow the application to be reviewed by academics, to make changes (if required), and to ultimately gain final approval. Failure to comply with this process may result in a mark of 0 for the project.

Composition of Module Mark: Coursework (100%)
Module pass requirement: At least 40%
Note: Reassessment by resubmission, the second submission mark is capped at 40%
Comments:
The student must confirm that the research is desk-based with all data gathered remotely.
All data collected or gathered need to comply with COVID-19 government guidance and advice
Referencing will need to be amended to APA style (7th edition)
Assessment Component
Weighting Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
Coursework Project proposal, including a literature review and research methods 2000 words 100% Y Y Y Y
You must participate in the ethics approval process for your research; consequently, you must complete and submit an ethics proposal for approval before data collection. You must ensure that you do so in a timely fashion that will allow your application to be reviewed by academics,
to make any changes (if required), and to ultimately gain final approval. Failure to comply with this process may result in a mark of 0 for your project.
Re-assessment will be by resubmission of the project proposal based on feedback received.
Re-assessment will be within the relevant resit period.
Reassessment will not be automatic but will be at the discretion of the exam board depending on whether your project is deemed recoverable and your second submission mark will be capped at 40%. Any reassessment must have ethical approval.
Assessment
Composition of Module Mark: Coursework 100%
Pass requirements: Module mark must be at least 40%
Assignment Guidelines
1. Report Structure: Your report should contain the following:
Appropriate coversheet
Title Page, including the given title in full, Name, Course, Module, etc
Table of Content Page
Introduction
References
Appendices, which should be numbered
2. Layout Structure: Your work should be word-processed using the following:
Font Style, Aerial, font size 12
1.5 line spacing
The page orientation should be ‘portrait’
Margins on both sides of the page should be no less than 2.5 cm
Pages should be numbered
Your name should appear on the script
Your student number should be included on every page
307AAE: Individual Project for Logistics and Transport Preparation
Marking Scheme and Feedback
Marks: 0 – 2 3 – 4 5 – 6 7 – 8 9 – 10
Little or no attention to presentation Some care is taken but evidence of spelling mistakes or typos Generally well presented Very well presented and Organised Professional level of presentation
1. Care in Presentation
Comments:
Marks: 0 – 4 5 – 8 10 – 12 14 – 16 17 – 20
Little or none of the expected content Some of the expected content Most of the expected content All of the expected content Exceptional content throughout
2. Extent of Content
Comments: .
Marks: 0 – 6 7 – 12 13 – 18 19 – 24 25 – 30
Little or no understanding of proposal purpose Some understanding of the proposal Understanding showed of individual elements but not always integrated Very well understood and integrated proposal A clear understanding of the purpose
3. Understanding of proposal elements
Comments:
Marks: 0- 8 9 – 16 17 – 24 25 – 32 33 – 40
Little or no relationship between the description of the project, research questions, and objectives Objectives are not SMART. Research questions are superficial. The description is unclear. Generic sources of information Clear description. A good set of SMART objectives. Research questions are clear and appropriate. Sources considered Objectives and deliverables flow from research questions. Research methods explained and sources considered Academically sound in every respect. Preparation for an excellent and professional project
4. Academic Rigor
Comments:
Marking Rubrics
Mark Weight Total
1. Presentation 1 10
2. Extent of Content 2 20
3. Understanding of Proposal Elements 3 30
4. Academic Rigors 4 40
Total: 100