经济|DB 8075BEF Digital Economy and Innovation Assignment 1

联系我们: 手动添加方式: 微信>添加朋友>企业微信联系人>13262280223 或者 QQ: 1483266981

DB 8075BEF Digital Economy and Innovation
Assignment 1
Due Date 3 November 2023 (Friday)
Weighting 20% of course grade
Format Written report; group basis
Word Limit No more than 3500 words
Course Intended
Learning Outcomes
Upon completion of this course, students should be able to:
1. Illustrate how e-commerce is shifting the global economy and
changing the mode and design of work.
2. Formulate a framework for innovation and knowledge management
in organizations.
3. Devise procedures for generating innovative ideas and apply design
thinking concepts and appropriate tools to formulate innovation
strategies in an organization.
4. Critically evaluate the impact of emerging digital technologies on
society.
Details
This is a written assignment to assess learning outcomes 1 to 4.
The purpose of this assignment is to analyze the innovation and knowledge management
processes of a chosen company and make recommendations by applying the design thinking
concepts.
The report is expected to include:
1. Background of the company. e.g., its size, industry, company, major products/services,
business strategy, major business processes, organization chart, key personnel roles and
responsibilities, etc.;
2. Analysis of the current processes and problems of innovation and knowledge management
processes of the company;
3. Recommendations on potential improvement with the application of the design thinking
concepts and emerging technologies;
4. Demonstration of professional reporting and referencing.
Regulations
(About grouping and company selection)
i. Students are required to work in a group, of a size of 5 or 6 members, to complete the assignment.
ii. Each group is required to send the member list and the preference of company selection to the tutor
no later than 12-Oct-2023 (Thursday).
iii. Company selection is made on a first-come, first-served basis, from a company list provided by the
tutor.
iv. Each student is expected to show active participation and contribution to the work of the assignment.
Each student is required to complete a peer evaluation form and submit it via the OLE Class
Activity by the assignment due date, i.e. 3-Nov-2023 (Friday).
(About the report)
v. The report should contain no more than 3500 words (excluding tables, figures, and appendices).
The appendix should be attached to the end of the report.
vi. The information of: full name and student ID of every group member, tutorial group number,
industry and company name and word count, should be clearly stated on the cover page of the
report.
vii. Students are expected to follow the APA Style (7th edition) created by the American Psychological
Association when citing sources in their assignments. A list of references should be included at the
end of each assignment.
viii. All writings must be in your own words. If direct copying from any source is found, it will result
in zero mark to the corresponding part or the whole assignment.
(About assignment submission)
ix. Each group should upload a soft copy of the assignment, in MS WORD format, to the OLE of the
course by 5:00pm on the submission due date. 10% of the marks awarded to the assignment will
be deducted for each calendar day overdue until the soft copy of the assignment is submitted.
x. As a mechanism to maintain academic integrity, assignments uploaded on the OLE will
automatically be sent to Turnitin for plagiarism checking before final submission. Please refer to
the quick start guide for submission of assignments to Turnitin on the OLE.
2
1
Need Improvement Acceptable Average Good Excellent
Company Background
(20%)
The report provides no or very
few information about the
chosen company and its
processes.
The report provides a partial
introduction of the chosen
company and shows a
simple summary of its
processes with a few key
information only.
The report provides a fair
introduction of the chosen
company and shows a fair
summary of its processes
with some key information.
The report provides a good
introduction of the chosen
company and shows a good
summary of its processes with
most key information.
The report provided an
excellent introduction of
the chosen company and
showed a comprehensive
summary of its processes
with most key information.
Discussion of the existing
processes and problems of
innovation and knowledge
management
(40%)
The report provides no or very
few connection with the
course content on innovation
management and knowledge
management processes, and
fails to identify any critical
problems of the processes.
The report provides some
connection with the course
content on innovation
management and
knowledge management
processes, and attempts to
identify critical problems of
the processes with loose
justifications.
The report provides a fair
connection with the course
content on innovation
management and
knowledge management
processes, and identifies
critical problems of the
processes with some
justifications.
The report provides a good
connection with the course
content on innovation
management and knowledge
management processes, and
identifies critical problems of
the processes with enough
justifications.
The report provided an
excellent connection with
the course content on
innovation management
and knowledge
management processes,
and identified critical
problems of the processes
with excellent
justifications.
Recommendations with
the application of design
thinking concepts and
emerging technologies
(30%)
The report provides no or very
limited recommendations with
no or irrelevant explanation
and examples on how the
company may apply design
thinking concepts and
emerging technologies to its
processes.
The report provides some
recommendations with less
relevant explanation and
examples on how the
company may apply design
thinking concepts and
emerging technologies to its
processes.
The report provides some
recommendations with
relevant explanation and
examples on how the
company may apply design
thinking concepts and
emerging technologies to
its processes.
The report provides good
recommendations with
detailed explanation and
examples on how the company
may apply design thinking
concepts and emerging
technologies to enhance its
processes.
The report provided
concrete recommendations
with insightful explanation
and examples on how the
company may apply design
thinking concepts and
emerging technologies to
enhance its processes.
Professional reporting and
referencing (10%)
The report is poorly written
and contains many disruptive
grammatical errors.
The report attempts to put
the information together
but in a loose way and
contains many grammatical
errors.
The report is fairly written
and proofread but with
minor grammatical
occasionally seen.
The report is well written and
proofread to eliminate most
grammatical errors.
The report was very well
written and proofread to
eliminate almost all
grammatical errors.

发表评论

了解 KJESSAY历史案例 的更多信息

立即订阅以继续阅读并访问完整档案。

继续阅读