联系我们： 手动添加方式: 微信>添加朋友>企业微信联系人>13262280223 或者 QQ: 1483266981

STAT5009 Decision Methods & Predictive Analytics Rubric for Marking Project Reports 1 Student Name: Does not meet expectations Meets expectations Exceeds expectations Score Introduction – No or very limited background information – Very hard to grasp what the problem is and why the data analysis is important – No outline for remaining report is given. No idea what to expect in the remainder of the report – Some background information is given – Some information is provided that may not be related to the problem at hand – Has some idea of what the problem is and its importance – Outline for remaining report is provided – Presents a clear and concise lead-in to the remainder of the report – Appropriate background information (including references) presented in organized fashion. – Problem is well developed. Hypotheses, if appropriate, are clearly stated. – Outline of the remaining report present and easily understandable /10 Description of Data and Methods – Far too brief or vague in describing data analysis methods to be used – No emphasis put on the description of the data set and/or key aspects associated with the data – No apparent link between question and methods used – Adequately describes selection of data and provides a general explanation on source of data – Adequately explains and justifies methods to be used – Minor issues related to the data and analysis may be omitted or not well explained – Presents a clear, concise description of the data, sources, and statistical methods used in the report – Important aspects of data set are clearly explained – Summary tables (if presented) are understandable and self- contained /10 Methodology – Methods incorrect and/or very poorly implemented – Incorrect use of methods or using methods that address a different question – Clear violation of assumptions – Key aspects of the data set and or methodological limitations are ignored – Methods appear to be sound but others could have been used – Adequately explains and justifies the methodology used and assumptions made – A more straightforward, concise approach to address question at hand could have been used – Utilizes sound exploratory and analysis methods to address the problem – Methods are not too complicated or simple for the problem at hand – Possibly questionable underlying assumptions are explained and/or checked – Uses methods/analyses not discussed in class /10 Analysis – Very little description of what was found or far too much extraneous information presented. – Summary tables and/or results are difficult to read and/or understand – Presentation of results is incomplete and there is no organization – No interpretation of the results relative to the problem is given – Description of the analysis is mostly clear but may be too brief or too long – Presentation of results in tabular and graphical form is adequate and clear – Appropriate and adequate interpretation of the results is carried out – Clear, concise description of what was found and how it was found – Results are presented in an easy to understand, and compelling, way with only the necessary pieces of information presented. – Results are interpreted and linked back to the problem at hand – Tables and figures are easy to understand and self- contained /40 STAT5009 Decision Methods & Predictive Analytics Rubric for Marking Project Reports 2 Conclusions – Completely illogical explanation of the findings and/or how they impact the problem – Does not highlight important results – Does not make recommendations for alternative/future analyses – Adequately reviews the problem and highlights main results – Interpretation and impact on results are explained, but there may be some omissions – Provides some recommendations for future work – Section satisfactorily reviews the problem – The results are well- summarized – Interpretation and impact of results on the problem are clearly explained – Recommendations for further/alternative studies are understandable and well thought out /10 Structure/ Documentation & References – Report not structured in logical fashion – Paragraphs are poorly organized; use of sections is illogical and hinders document navigation – R code/intermediate output not included in appendix, or appendix is incomplete – Fails to correctly document any sources or to utilize appropriate citation forms – Report is structure in a logical manner with some improvements possible – Paragraphs are usually well- organized; use of sections is logical and generally allows easy navigation of the document – R code and intermediate output appears in appendix – Most sources are correctly documented; appropriate citation forms are generally utilized – Report is organized in a clear, logical manner – All paragraphs are well- organized; use of sections is logical and allows easy navigation through the document – R code and intermediate output appears in appendix and is easy to navigate – All sources are correctly and thoroughly documented – appropriate citation forms are utilized throughout /10 Grammar – Sentences are poorly written; there are numerous incorrect word choices and errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling – Sentences are generally well-written; there are a few incorrect word choices and errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling – Sentences are well-written; there are no incorrect word choices and the text is free of errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling /10 Total /100 A Phatak, April 2017: Adapted from University of Colorado, Electrical, Computer & Energy Engineering and Purdue University, Department of Statistics